IPMI touch
Watch 1 minute demo of IPMI touch in action
 |
Control and monitor an unlimited number of IPMI-enabled devices via IPMI-over-LAN protocol right from your iPhone or iPod touch
Remote power control functions View Temperature, Fan, Voltage, Current, Power Supply, Battery, Processor, Drive, Interconnect and Security sensor groups Detailed chassis and individual sensors information screens Compatible with IPMI v1.5 and IPMI v2.0 protocols IPMI v2.0 SHA1 and SHA1/SHA1-96 ciphers for authentication and integrity IPMI SDR cache for fast sensor status refresh Configurable network retry and timeout settings
|
Download now from the iPhone App Store
Not sure if IPMI touch will work with your hardware?
Try the free version of the application built on the same core - IPMI light.
IPMI touch requires devices equipped with
IPMI-compliant management controllers like
DELL DRAC, HP iLO2, IBM RSA, SUN ILOM, Xserve LOM
or similar for proper operation.
3 Responses to “IPMI touch”
Leave a Reply
Dear Yellow Kompressor,
I manage a few Intel XServes and I am unable to connect to LOM on any of them using IPMI Lite. What settings should I be using?
The farthest I have gotten is with the following settings:
Protocol: IPMI v2.0
Cipher: SHA1
name: xxxx
pass: xxxx
role: ADMINISTRATOR
But, I always get this error: “RAKP 4 message indicates an error: invalid integrity check value”. I am currently using an iPhone 4.
Thanks,
Aaron
Aaron,
Xserve LOM requires RMCP+ OEM extension of the IPMI-over-LAN protocol (-o intelplus option in ipmitool). This extension is enabled by default in Apple-compiled ipmitool. The protocol that implements intelplus in IPMI touch is listed as IPMI v2.0 Intel with RMCP+ on the protocol selection page in the app.
Would like to use this software but am unable to connect to my server. I need to use a PORT so that my router can FORWARD the connection request to the appropriate internal IP. (port forwarding) When I configure IPMI Lite with xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:port it says “address lookup for (address) failed”. I’m sure it’s because it’s not setup to use or understand the port request. Chance this could be updated? Is there another method you would suggest using if your trying to get around a firewall to connect to a server (very typical I would think) Thanks.